• About
  • Services
  • Sectors
  • Our Clients
  • Blogs
  • Contact

Constructing Transformer Bund Fire Walls – A Civil Engineer’s Perspective

Transformer bund fire walls rarely get the attention they deserve, until something goes wrong. These structures sit quietly on substations across the country, often taken for granted, yet they carry an enormous responsibility: containing catastrophic oil spills, preventing fire spread, and protecting people and plant in the worst-case scenario. Choosing the right material for the job requires more than a glance at the lowest tender price. Here, I walk through the four most common construction options and what really matters when making that decision.

Transformer bund fire walls are not just boundary structures. They are safety-critical elements designed to:

From a civil engineering standpoint, material selection is driven by performance, durability, constructability and whole-life cost, not simply initial price.

Below, I examine the four principal material options commonly used in the UK:

Reinforced Concrete (In Situ)

In situ reinforced concrete is the traditional and often preferred solution for transformer bund fire walls, particularly in primary substations and DNO installations.

The bund base and walls are typically cast monolithically, providing both oil containment and fire separation in a single structural system.

Electrical substation with large transformers and power lines, situated on a gravel car park with concrete footpaths and a clear sky overhead.

Cost

Typically, the highest capital cost option, particularly where heavy reinforcement or thicker fire walls are required.

Speed of Construction

Moderate to slow. Programme impact depends on curing time and sequencing within the wider civil works.

Where It Works Best

Pros

Cons

Reinforced Concrete (Precast)

Precast reinforced concrete panels are manufactured in factory conditions and installed on site onto prepared foundations or RC base slabs.

They offer similar structural and fire performance to in situ concrete but with different constructability advantages.

Industrial electrical substation construction site with a large power transformer mounted on a concrete foundation and metal framework in the background under a partly cloudy sky.

Cost

Moderate to high. Often competitive when programme savings are factored in.

Speed of Construction

Fast once foundations are ready. Significant programme benefit over in situ concrete.

Where It Works Best

Pros

Cons

Masonry Construction (Concrete Blockwork)

Masonry bund fire walls are generally constructed using concrete blockwork, sometimes reinforced and grouted for additional strength.

They are typically used for smaller installations or lower-risk environments.

A snow-covered electrical substation with transformers and power lines next to a brick building and fenced perimeter.

Cost

Lowest upfront capital cost.

Speed of Construction

Moderate. Labour-intensive and dependent on blocklaying productivity.

Where It Works Best

Pros

Cons

Steelwork Systems (Durasteel)

Steel bund fire walls are typically modular systems formed from galvanised or coated steel panels, fixed to structural steel frames and anchored to foundations.

Three large blue electrical transformers are installed outdoors on concrete pads, separated by metallic fire barriers, with gravel covering the ground around them.

Cost

Moderate initial cost. Can become more expensive when fire protection and long-term maintenance are included.

Speed of Construction

Very fast once foundations and steel frame are prepared.

Where It Works Best

Pros

Cons

Comparison Table – Transformer Bund Fire Wall Materials

Material Capital Cost Speed of Construction Fire Resistance Structural Robustness Maintenance Typical Design Life Typical Application
In Situ Reinforced Concrete
High
Moderate–Slow
Excellent (2–4+ hrs)
Excellent
Low
50–60+ years
Primary substations, DNO sites
Precast Reinforced Concrete
Moderate–High
Fast
Excellent
Very Good
Low–Moderate (joints)
40–60 years
Modular or time-critical schemes
Masonry (Blockwork)
Low
Moderate
Good
Moderate
Moderate
25–40 years
Smaller private installations
Steelwork
Moderate
Very Fast
Poor without protection
Moderate
High
20–40 years
Removable for transformer installation

Civil Engineering Perspective

When designing transformer bund fire walls, we focus on five key questions:

  1. What is the required fire rating?
  2. What is the oil containment volume?
  3. Is blast resistance required?
  4. What is the intended design life?
  5. What are the programme constraints?

For permanent primary substations, reinforced concrete, whether in situ or precast, almost always provides the most reliable, durable and compliant solution.

Masonry and steelwork systems certainly have their place, but typically in smaller, temporary or lower-risk environments.

Ultimately, bund fire walls are designed for worst-case scenarios. Material choice should reflect that reality, prioritising performance, resilience and long-term safety over short-term savings.

Table of Contents

READY TO START YOUR NEW PROJECT?

Please fill in the form and we will get back to you as soon as possible to discuss your new project.

Contact Form

Latest News